AI citation reach over time — answer-time cites (violet) over training crawls, summed across EXID's tracked releases
Why this trend rank
#8 this week · 5.1- Korea search+7.7
Naver searches clearly up vs last week
- Fan challenges0
no change measured this week
- Media pickup0
no change measured this week
- YouTube traction0
no change measured this week
- Reader pulls0
no change measured this week
Rank is velocity, not size — this week versus last, across signals we only observe: Korea search, YouTube traction, other outlets' pickup, and fan challenges. Only one signal moved, so this rank rests on a single source.
Search demand · 158d — Naver relative interest
Per-vendor reach — full data
| AI engine | Reads | Type |
|---|---|---|
| OpenAI | 79 | answer-time citation |
| ByteDance | 34 | training crawl · blocked |
| Meta | 30 | training crawl |
| Amazon | 27 | training crawl |
| Anthropic | 15 | training crawl |
| Apple | 14 | training crawl |
| Common Crawl | 4 | training crawl |
| Perplexity | 4 | training crawl |
| Other | 2 | training crawl |
Measured by KTRENZ · ai_crawler_path_daily · 175 total reads · 65 answer-time citations across 8 vendors
Artist entityEXID
releases → AI reach → demand
Coverage log
newest first · 1 tracked storiesThe receipts behind the graph — what KTRENZ published on EXID and how far each spread across AI. Tap any story for its full reach map.
· · · before 2026-07-22 — search-demand only (predates KTRENZ coverage)
AI reach = ai_crawler_path_daily (measured) · demand = Naver search (relative interest, ~180d history) + YouTube · each story links to its own full reach map